The town of Køge was once the back­drop for one of history’s most vio­lent pol­ter­gei­st outbreaks—a seri­es of events that spar­ked Denmark’s lar­gest witch hunt

Køge is a modest-sized town south of Copen­ha­gen that no lon­ger plays a cen­tral role in natio­nal affairs. In the ear­ly 17th cen­tury, howe­ver, a merchant’s hou­se in the town cen­tre beca­me the epi­cen­ter of a pro­tra­cted seri­es of ter­ri­fying dis­tur­ban­ces run­ning from 1608 to 1615, cul­mi­nat­ing in a seri­es of witch tri­als and execu­tions. Today, a com­me­mora­ti­ve plaque marks the site of the long-sin­ce demo­lis­hed pro­per­ty, remem­be­ring the pheno­menon known in Danish history as Køge Huskors.

Plaque at Køge town squa­re, whe­re the noto­rious hou­se once stood, com­me­morat­ing the events. It reads: “Here once roa­med the Huskors of Køge 1608–1615”

The term huskors, which trans­la­tes direct­ly to “hou­se cross”, is a now archaic phra­se sig­ni­fying a heavy domestic affli­ction, tri­al, or spi­ri­tu­al bur­den. ‘Køge Huskors’ is typi­cal­ly used to refer to two distin­ct thin­gs: the col­lecti­ve events that cen­te­red aro­und the hou­se­hold during tho­se years, or more spe­ci­fi­cal­ly the “for­ce” belie­ved to be behind the mis­chief. In this arti­c­le, I will use the term Huskors in a more abstra­ct way, to refer to the col­lecti­ve, super­na­tu­ral hap­pe­nings that took pla­ce.

The pri­mary tar­gets of the Køge Huskors were a mer­chant named Hans Bart­skjær, his wife Anna, and their chil­dren. But also ser­vants, live-in rela­ti­ves, visi­tors, and even domestic ani­mals were swept into the tur­moil. At its peak, the events spil­led bey­ond the mer­chant house’s walls and engul­fed the enti­re town.

17th cen­tury map of Køge, with the loca­tion of the Bart­skjær hou­se encirc­led.

Pol­ter (or poul­try?) gei­st acti­vi­ty

It all appears to have star­ted with one par­ti­cu­lar inci­dent: Anna and Hans Bart­skjær were lying in bed one night, when all of a sud­den they heard from under­ne­ath their pil­low, a sound like the cluck­ing of a hen cal­ling on its chi­cks. A fran­tic search through the bed­ding she­ets, and even­tu­al­ly the bed itself, pro­du­ced no such ani­mal — or inde­ed anyt­hing else they could attri­bu­te the sound to. After this very modest intro­duction, howe­ver, the huskors qui­ck­ly step­ped up its acti­vi­ties.

Ope­rat­ing with clas­sic tri­ck­ster-like vola­ti­li­ty, the huskors fluctu­a­ted betwe­en invi­si­bi­li­ty and tan­gib­le forms. When unse­en, it hur­led fur­ni­tu­re, dis­pla­ced per­so­nal items that later reap­pea­red elsewhe­re, and phy­si­cal­ly assaul­ted the hou­se­hold. On one occa­sion, the family’s small dog was seized by an invi­sib­le for­ce, slam­med against the cei­ling, and vio­lent­ly thrown to the floor. When the ter­ri­fied ani­mal tri­ed to hide, it was drag­ged out by the scruff of its neck and abu­sed once more. The next day, aggres­si­ve and erra­tic, the dog had to be put down.

Some­ti­mes peop­le would get the same tre­at­ment as the ani­mals. The youn­gest Bart­skjær son, only 2 years old at the time, fell into a fit whe­re he pul­led tufts of hair out of his head and tore his clo­t­hes off. Once when the eldest son was lying ill, his bed was lif­ted 1 meter into the air, drop­ped again and boun­ced up and down. Anna went to get her hus­band, but when they came back to their son’s room they discove­red that he had been taken out of bed and was stan­ding on his head with his arms stret­ched out. Only after an inten­se strug­g­le did they mana­ge to get him back into bed.

A young nep­hew or cou­sin to Hans Bart­skjær, Jacob, who was living with the family at the time, expe­ri­en­ced somet­hing similar one day at the din­ner tab­le. Sud­den­ly he was pul­led away from the tab­le and out into the cour­ty­ard, qui­ck­ly fol­lowed (on foot) by the rest of the family. Here he was found dang­ling high above the gro­und, feet down and arms stret­ched upwards and his chin moving up and down, as if it was about to come off. Eve­ry­bo­dy tri­ed their har­dest to get him down, but not­hing wor­ked. Final­ly the family resor­ted to pray­er, which seems to have had an effect, as the boy even­tu­al­ly fell to the gro­und again. Fol­lowing this was a loud rum­b­le which soun­ded like a deep voi­ce, alt­hough no one could make sen­se of what was said. At the same time came a glowing fire­ball that shot from one end of the cour­ty­ard to the other.

A mena­ge­rie of bizar­re enti­ties

The huskors frequent­ly mani­fe­sted as stran­ge, poly­morp­hic appa­ri­tions too—displaying a distin­ct pre­fe­ren­ce for ani­mal forms. Short­ly after the ini­ti­al cluck­ing inci­dent, Anna Bart­skjær enco­un­te­red a hideous toad with elon­ga­ted, hen-like legs strut­ting toward her through the cour­ty­ard gates. Frigh­te­ned­ly, she cal­led out to the other mem­bers of the hou­se­hold, but when they arri­ved out­si­de the cre­a­tu­re had faded away. On later occa­sions the huskors appea­red as a goo­se, a raven, a dog, a rat, a pig and even a mon­key.

​The huskors also adop­ted gro­tesque huma­noid sha­pes. One night the­re was a loud scream from the attic. Anne and Hans’ youn­gest daugh­ter Lis­beth came crying down the stairs, relaying that a ter­rib­le cre­a­tu­re had grab­bed her shirt and told her it was going to take her. She descri­bed it as a man-like being with eyes like dis­hes and feet and claws like tho­se of a hen.

The various gui­ses of the Køge Huskors. Taken from the tit­le leaf of the Ger­man edi­tion (1696) of the book “Et for­fær­de­ligt huskors” by Johan Bruns­mand.

At its most insi­dious, the huskors enga­ged in out­right mimi­cry. Retur­ning home from choir pra­cti­ce one night, Anna found the hou­se­hold in an upro­ar aro­und her mot­her, who­se face was frozen in a gro­tesque faci­al distor­tion with her legs thras­hing vio­lent­ly. The mot­her accu­sed Anna of phy­si­cal­ly assaul­ting her ear­li­er that after­noon. It turns out that the huskors had assu­med Anna’s like­ness in her absen­ce, to torment the elder­ly woman.

​Nor were the mani­fe­sta­tions con­fi­ned to the Bart­skjær pro­per­ty. One time, Anna had to lea­ve town to pur­sue an errand. On the way back the hor­secar­ri­a­ge beca­me so heavy, for no appa­rent rea­son, that she was delay­ed until long after mid­night — unrea­so­nably late for what was nor­mal­ly a rou­ti­ne trip. The moment she final­ly arri­ved at the hou­se, the clo­ck struck 1 and the tre­es in the gar­den star­ted to cre­ak, whi­le some huge object, like a tower, rose into the air. From it came a ter­rib­le voi­ce, but its words were unde­cip­he­rab­le. Ter­ri­fied and exhau­sted, Anna Bart­skjær mana­ged to final­ly get insi­de and climb into bed.

Various stran­ge ail­ments

Hans, Anna, and many others, expe­ri­en­ced various phy­si­cal affli­ctions during their time with the huskors – often stran­ge, unk­nown disea­ses and symp­toms. One of the ser­vants was bedrid­den for half a year, and the oldest daugh­ter had one expe­ri­en­ce which left her so sick that she couldn’t hold any food down for three days. The huskors see­med to have it in par­ti­cu­lar­ly bad for the nep­hew Jacob. Some­ti­mes he was found lying as if cruci­fied, with his eyes rol­led back. At one time he didn’t sle­ep for a who­le month becau­se he was so relent­les­s­ly haun­ted and atta­ck­ed. This, of cour­se, took a heavy toll on him and drai­ned him of all his ener­gy. Then one day he stood up and eve­ryt­hing was fine. He was never per­so­nal­ly troub­led by the huskors again.

​The same could not be said for Hans Bart­skjær. Short­ly after Jacob had beco­me well again, Hans star­ted to act stran­ge­ly aro­und the rest of the family. After it had gone on for some weeks, he final­ly told them that eve­ry day for seve­ral hours during that peri­od, somet­hing invi­sib­le had hung onto him heavily, like a sack of corn. Some­ti­mes it felt like a hard egg jab­bing into one side of his body, and often he fain­ted due to the pain.

​Next, the oldest son star­ted to com­plain about seve­re abdo­mi­nal pains. Some­ti­mes a bump would appear on his sto­mach and move aro­und, making nois­es like a pig chewing. He let out ani­ma­li­stic gro­ans, spat blood, and suf­fe­red cata­to­nic epi­so­des whe­re his limbs lock­ed so rigid­ly that he could be prop­ped against a wall like a plank of wood. After a whi­le, he also beca­me well, and it see­med as if the tests of the Køge Huskors were now over. In the mean­ti­me, howe­ver, Hans Bart­skær had died. But the specta­c­le was not to end for a coup­le more years.

Accor­ding to some sour­ces, this epi­taph from Køge St. Nico­lai Church depi­cts Hans and Anna Bart­skjær, with the third figu­re in the lower left cor­ner belie­ved to be Anna’s sub­sequent hus­band Kort Rich­ters.

Pla­cing the bla­me

Alt­hough we would view thin­gs a lot dif­fe­rent­ly today, back then the­re were not many options as to who or what could be the sour­ce of such dis­tur­ban­ces. In fact, could be only one: The Devil.

​How the evil one had got­ten into the Bart­skjær hou­se to begin with was discus­sed con­ti­nu­al­ly among the affected. For a whi­le the foster son Jacob was accu­sed, but this line of thought was soon drop­ped. The specu­la­tion inste­ad went back to one time, when the huskors had indi­ca­ted to Hans Bart­skjær that a woman in town had sent the devil after them on pur­po­se, and that only when the cul­prit was found and brought to justi­ce would thin­gs go back to nor­mal again. It so hap­pe­ned that one local woman, Johan­ne Tho­me­ses, some time pri­or to the affair had been in a dis­pu­te with Hans Bart­skjær over a pro­per­ty deal that had ended in a harsh exchan­ge of words. It was there­fo­re not too hard to pla­ce the bla­me on her, espe­ci­al­ly sin­ce the­re was alre­a­dy a widespre­ad belief in wit­ches aro­und Køge, and Johan­ne Tho­me­ses was a much malig­ned per­son local­ly.

An all too fami­li­ar tale then ensu­ed, whe­re a who­le net­work of fel­low con­spira­tors, most of them women, was slo­wly unra­ve­l­ed – one impli­cat­ing ano­t­her and so on, all under questio­nab­le met­hods of “per­su­a­sion”.

An asso­ci­a­te of Johan­ne Tho­me­ses testi­fied that they toget­her had conju­red up the evil one from Tho­me­ses back­y­ard well, in the gui­se of a rat. The­re was also a similar ritu­al a whi­le later at a cre­ek out­si­de the town limits. Both sup­po­sed­ly ini­ti­a­ted with the pur­po­se of tar­ge­ting the Bart­skjær hou­se­hold. One of the epi­so­des that gai­ned the most atten­tion and outcry during this time, was the defile­ment of Saint Nico­lai Church bap­tis­mal fount by one of the accu­sed women.

The old Saint Niko­lai bap­tis­mal foun­tain, which was instant­ly rem­o­ved when the desecra­tion was discove­red. It is now dis­play­ed at Køge Muse­um.

A seri­es of tri­als began in 1612 and unfol­ded over the next seve­ral years. In the wave of pro­secu­tions that fol­lowed, sixte­en women were con­dem­ned to death by bur­ning. Whi­le one mana­ged to esca­pe and a few took their own lives befo­re their sen­ten­ce was to com­men­ce, at least thir­te­en women were still execu­ted by the end of 1615 for their alle­ged invol­ve­ment in the Køge Huskors affair—making it the lar­gest, con­cen­tra­ted witch hunt- and execu­tion in Danish history by num­bers.

From pri­va­te notes to the vati­can archi­ves

The main rea­son why we have so many details of the Køge Huskors affair today, is becau­se an acco­unt was writ­ten down by Anna Bart­skjær, some years after the events had subsi­ded. This then circu­la­ted aro­und in various handwrit­ten, “under­gro­und” copies for deca­des, befo­re com­ing to the atten­tion of one Johan Bruns­mand, an ordai­ned Lut­he­ran pri­est and rector of the pre­sti­gious Her­lufsholm boar­ding school from 1668 to 1677.

Bruns­mand soon star­ted sear­ching for inde­pen­dent con­fir­ma­tion of the fan­ta­stic sto­ri­es. He mana­ged to tra­ck down a few elder­ly citizens of Køge, who pro­fes­sed to still remem­ber the events. This inclu­ded one of the Bart­skjær daugh­ters, Lis­bet, who had enco­un­te­red the enti­ty with the chi­ck­en feet in the attic.

Seeking some more offi­ci­al “weight” to the story, Bruns­mand con­ta­cted the city may­or and coun­cil of Køge, who main­tai­ned that, even though they could not say what had cau­sed the Køge Huskors, the sto­ri­es were in their opi­ni­on true and had been pas­sed down to them from their pre­de­ces­sors as facts.

Bruns­mand was still not qui­te satis­fied, and even­tu­al­ly loo­k­ed into all the sour­ces avai­lab­le to him that could unequi­vo­cal­ly con­firm the events. He mana­ged to do this through the city hall’s regi­sters from the peri­od. The­se records final­ly con­vin­ced him that somet­hing out of the ordi­nary had hap­pe­ned at the mer­chant’s hou­se.

In 1674 Johan Bruns­man publis­hed Anna Bart­skjærs acco­unt, toget­her with his own inve­sti­ga­tory fin­dings and com­men­tary, under the tit­le Et for­fær­de­ligt Huus-kaars (“A Ter­rib­le Hou­se-Cross”).

A 1674 first edi­tion copy of Bruns­mand’s book, also dis­play­ed at Køge Muse­um as part of an exhi­bi­tion about Køge Huskors.

The book reso­na­ted across Euro­pe; pro­mi­nent scho­lars com­men­ted on the case, and an offi­ci­al report was com­pi­led for the Vati­can, whe­re it repor­ted­ly remains pre­ser­ved in the archi­ves. The volu­me pro­ved remar­kably enduring, see­ing numerous trans­la­tions and edi­tions in Danish, Ger­man, and Lat­in over the years. In 1870 it was publis­hed in an edi­ted ver­sion by the pio­ne­e­ring Danish soci­a­list lea­der, Lou­is Pio, and in 1953 the most recent edi­tion came, with exten­si­ve, addi­tio­nal research and com­men­tary by runo­lo­gist and folkl­o­re resear­cher Anders Bæk­sted.

​Whi­le 20th-cen­tury scho­lars ana­lyzed the case through folkl­o­ric, parap­sy­cho­lo­gi­cal and cli­ni­cal psy­cho­lo­gi­cal len­ses, peop­le the­se days lar­ge­ly view it as a histo­ri­cal curio­si­ty — a novel relic of a bygo­ne era. But one that is very much still kept ali­ve and che­ris­hed as part of Køge’s cul­tu­ral history.

A poster for a 1987 play at Køge Ama­t­eur The­a­tre, that shows the long-lived tra­di­tion of chi­ck­ens and hens asso­ci­a­ted with the town. For a long time after the events, the Køge Huskors affair was popu­lar­ly — and later also joking­ly — tal­ked about as “The Køge Chi­ck­en-Cluck” case or “The Story of The Køge Hens”

Com­men­tary

The Køge Huskors case defies easy cate­go­riza­tion. Alt­hough it sha­res ele­ments with pol­ter­gei­st out­bre­aks, it departs from the stan­dard tra­jectory in dura­tion, star­ting sig­na­tu­re, and phy­si­cal mani­fe­sta­tion. Pol­ter­gei­st dis­tur­ban­ces typi­cal­ly resol­ve wit­hin weeks or mont­hs and begin with indi­stin­ct rap­pings; the events in Køge, by con­trast, per­si­sted for years and were cha­ra­cte­rized ear­ly on by distin­ct ani­mal sounds and gro­tesque zoo­morp­hic appa­ri­tions.

In many respects, the case mir­r­ors clas­sic acco­unts of demo­nic pos­ses­sion more than a con­ven­tio­nal haun­ting: victims suf­fe­red levi­ta­tions, assu­med mock-cruci­fixion poses, and pro­du­ced voca­liza­tions osten­sibly belon­ging to foreign enti­ties.

Whi­le the­se pheno­me­na do appear spora­di­cal­ly throug­hout pol­ter­gei­st lite­ra­tu­re, the vari­e­ty and phy­si­cal vio­len­ce of the Køge epi­so­des remain extra­or­di­nary. The clo­sest histo­ri­cal paral­lel is found in a case like “The Demon Drum­mer of Tedworth” (1661), whe­re phy­si­cal dis­tur­ban­ces similar­ly inter­sected with reli­gious hyste­ria. 

Cruci­al­ly, the pro­mi­nent ani­mal mani­fe­sta­tions (such as frogs, birds, and swi­ne) alig­ned with con­tem­porary belief in wit­ches familiars—an asso­ci­a­tion that would have acti­ve­ly fue­led the judi­ci­al witch hunt and appears in the tri­al testi­mo­nies.

17th cen­tury depi­ctions relat­ing to the Drum­mer of Tedworth case, often refer­red to as “Britain’s First Pol­ter­gei­st”. It is easy to spot the paral­lels to the Køge Huskors affair just from glan­cing at the­se ima­ges.

At the core of the histo­ri­cal record lies Anne Bartskjær’s per­so­nal acco­unt. Writ­ten down long after the events, when she was an aging woman, her nar­ra­ti­ve must be appro­a­ched with sound histo­ri­cal cau­tion. Human memory is recon­structi­ve, and deca­des of com­mu­ni­ty gos­sip, seve­re per­so­nal trau­ma, and post-tri­al ratio­na­liza­tion ine­vi­tably war­ped spe­ci­fic details and ampli­fied dra­ma­tic memo­ri­es.

Yet dis­mis­sing the acco­unt as pure fabri­ca­tion would be a mista­ke. The nar­ra­ti­ve con­tains seve­ral ele­ments that an ear­ly modern merchant’s wife had neit­her the incen­ti­ve nor the com­pa­ra­ti­ve lite­ra­tu­re to invent out of who­le clo­th. We also have the offi­ci­al records that sup­port much of what appears in Anna’s wri­tings. What we are look­ing at is rat­her a genu­i­ne core of extra­or­di­nary disruption—whether roo­ted in seve­re psy­cho­lo­gi­cal strain, pro­fo­und phy­si­cal ano­ma­ly, or somet­hing genu­i­ne­ly inexplicable—heavily refra­cted through seve­ral years of memory and the pre­vai­ling demo­no­lo­gi­cal wor­ld­view of the 17th cen­tury.

​Regar­ding Johan Bruns­mand, he was unde­ni­ably a pro­duct of his era and an ort­ho­dox Lut­he­ran cle­ric. He did not com­pi­le his work to cri­tique the case from a ratio­na­list per­specti­ve, but pre­ci­se­ly to coun­ter such lines of thought that aimed to take God out of the equa­tion. Nevert­he­less, he demon­stra­ted a notab­le degree of sour­ce cri­ti­cism when cross-refe­ren­cing wit­ness acco­unts and muni­ci­pal records, noting awkward con­tra­di­ctions rat­her than over­look­ing them to ser­ve his agen­da.

In the end, Brunsmand’s detai­led book had an almost imme­di­a­te — and unin­ten­ded — posi­ti­ve lega­cy. By laying bare the coerci­ve met­hods and cata­strop­hic human cost of the witch tri­als, Et for­fær­de­ligt Huus-kaars con­tri­bu­ted to growing judi­ci­al skep­ti­cism across Scandinavia—ultimately hel­ping bring an end to the era of legal witch bur­nings in Den­mark.

Select Sour­ces

  • Alan Gauld & A.D. Cor­nell — Pol­ter­gei­sts (1979)
  • Anders Bæk­sted — Køge Huskors for Køge Byting (Fra Køben­havns Amt, 1951)
  • Carl Vett – Kjø­ge Huskors (Kvar­tals­skrift for Psy­kisk Forsk­ning, 1917)
  • Chr. Jacob­sen — Køge Huskors (Det Ukend­te no. 3, 1981)
  • L. Han­sen — Køge Huskors og Spø­ge­ri­et I Resau (Sand­heds­sø­ge­ren no. 189, Novem­ber 1912)
  • Johan Bruns­mand — Et for­fær­de­ligt Huus-kaars… (various edi­tions)
  • Jør­gen Ste­en Jen­sen — Det Beryg­te­de Hus (Skalk no. 5, 1979)
  • Mogens Svedstrup — Hvad var “Kjø­ge Huuskors” egent­lig for noget (Okkul­ti­sten no. 8, August 1942)
  • S. Von Huth — Spi­ri­tis­me kon­tra mate­ri­a­lis­me(1919)