In the ear­ly 1980s, a man’s car stal­led when a myste­rious object appea­red in Aasum. Read the story of the enco­un­ter with a group of hig­hly unusu­al beings here

Case Type: CE3

When: Fall of 1981 or ’82 (not repor­ted and inve­sti­ga­ted befo­re 1996)

Whe­re: Aasum, Funen (GPS 55.399125, 10.460940)

Inve­sti­ga­tors: Toke Haun­strup & Erling Hege­lund

The Enco­un­ter

One late night/early mor­ning in 1981 or ’82, a man in his ear­ly 20’s, who gave his name as “PN” , was dri­ving to work at a ware­hou­se in Oden­se. At 02:10 AM, he drove away from home in his car through the vil­la­ge of Aasum, 4 kilo­me­ters east of Oden­se. The vil­la­ge sur­ro­unds a tiny beech forest fra­med by three roads, giving the forest a tri­angu­lar sha­pe with each side being 150 metres long. PN was dri­ving up the stre­et Sned­ker­stræ­de, which went along this forest area. When the car rea­ched the small hill just befo­re the T‑junction at Aasum Byga­de, the engi­ne stop­ped wor­king, but the car con­ti­nu­ed rol­ling down the hill. At the T‑junction, PN stop­ped the car with the bra­ke.

Then he saw somet­hing tru­ly stran­ge 60 metres away, furt­her right down Aasum Byga­de: A light pheno­menon hove­ring somewhe­re betwe­en the road and the forest floor at a height of 1–2 metres. This light was sha­ped like a circ­le and was about 3 metres in dia­me­ter, illu­mi­nat­ing the sur­ro­un­dings with a yel­low colour.

PN then saw a ramp lea­ding down from the round ball of light to the forest floor, and a door ope­ning to the inte­r­i­or of the object. The object’s inte­r­i­or resem­b­led ”an oran­ge cloud”. PN also noti­ced two groups of beings stan­ding near the UFO. The first group con­si­sted of seven small beings who kept going up and down the ramp, see­m­ing­ly col­lecting samp­les of vege­ta­tion and soil from the forest floor which they gave to “someo­ne” insi­de the craft. The second group con­si­sted of three big­ger enti­ties, two stan­ding atop the ramp near the entran­ce to the craft and one stan­ding at the ramp’s foot.

PN got the impres­sion that the tal­ler beings were a kind of ”guar­di­ans” and noti­ced them all stan­ding com­ple­te­ly still. The shor­ter beings were aro­und 1 meter in height and light grey in colour, resem­bling two tri­ang­les sta­ck­ed upon each other with the top tri­ang­le being somewhat smal­ler. PN assu­med that the small top tri­ang­le was each being’s head. The ”guar­di­ans” were similar in appea­ran­ce. PN did not see any arms, but he did see the “guar­di­ans” hol­ding what appea­red to be some kind of mea­suring instru­ments. The beings had small stub­by legs but the legs did not appear to move. Inste­ad, they see­med to gli­de or hover above the gro­und like hovercraft.

Inter­pre­ta­tion of the “enti­ties” by Simon Hes­sela­ger Johan­sen

After having wat­ched the UFO and the beings for a minu­te or so, the sho­ck­ed PN noti­ced somet­hing else that was stran­ge: In the oppo­si­te direction, he saw a taxi par­ked near the cre­ek (Oden­se Å). The taxi’s dri­ver was blinking repe­a­ted­ly with his head­lights, but PN did­n’t get if they were meant as a sig­nal to him or to the UFO and its crew. He then star­ted the car’s engi­ne, and noti­ced that it wor­ked per­fect­ly. At the same time, the beings noti­ced they were being wat­ched and began moving towards PN’s car at a high velo­ci­ty. The taxi then took a 180 degree turn and drove towards Oden­se. PN, now frigh­te­ned, qui­ck­ly tur­ned left and fol­lowed the same direction. When PN had dri­ven about 150 metres down Aasum Byga­de, he loo­k­ed in the rear view mir­ror and saw the UFO occu­pants stan­ding in the mid­dle of the brid­ge that goes over the cre­ek. Short­ly afterwards, the road tur­ned and the beings vanis­hed out of his sight.

When arri­ving at work in Oden­se, PN noti­ced that he was unusu­al­ly ear­ly as a result of dri­ving so fast. After his shift was over, he drove back to Aasum and loo­k­ed at the area whe­re he saw the UFO and the ali­ens. He found no phy­si­cal tra­ces whatso­e­ver.

Rudi­men­tary map of the area whe­re the enco­un­ter play­ed out

After­math and Inve­sti­ga­tion

PN did not report the enco­un­ter to any­o­ne out­si­de of his family until 1996. That year Scan­di­navi­an UFO Infor­ma­tion recei­ved a tip from PN’s mot­her, who toget­her with her hus­band had an unusu­al expe­ri­en­ce of their own a year or two ear­li­er, whe­re a UFO stop­ped their car.

The two SUFOI inve­sti­ga­tors that were put on the case, Erling Hege­lund and Toke Haun­strup, inter­viewed PN and found that he was con­vin­ced that both his enco­un­ter and that of his parents were genu­i­ne cases of con­ta­ct with extra­ter­re­stri­al beings. PN also clai­med to have deve­l­oped precog­ni­ti­ve psy­chic abi­li­ties after his clo­se enco­un­ter. Howe­ver, the­se abi­li­ties did­n’t appear to have been bul­let­proof, sin­ce he had been invol­ved in many serious traf­fic acci­dents during the years as well. He did not spe­ci­fy whet­her he thought the­se were con­nected to the UFO inci­dent.

Hege­lund and Haun­strup also paid a visit to the loca­tion itself, to see how it fit with PN’s story, but they did­n’t beco­me any wiser. During this time, they even tri­ed to find peop­le in the area who might have seen somet­hing back then that could help the inve­sti­ga­tion. They did­n’t have any luck with this, in part becau­se most near­by resi­dents did­n’t even live the­re in the ear­ly 1980’s. SUFOI also tri­ed to find the taxi dri­ver who blin­ked his lights from near the cre­ek, through a per­so­nal ad in the local news­pa­per, but to no avail.

Newer pho­to of the “lan­ding site”

Com­men­tary

At the out­set, the Aasum case seems solid and qui­te rare for Den­mark: A tru­ly ali­en look­ing spa­ces­hip and crew, that might be robo­tic rat­her than flesh-and-blood cre­a­tu­res, who end up cha­sing the wit­ness after he dri­ves away in his car. To say not­hing of the wit­ness being per­ma­nent­ly chan­ged by his expe­ri­en­ce by appa­rent­ly get­ting psy­chic powers from the ali­ens. This hits all the marks for an all time UFO clas­sic. Howe­ver, the­re are some thin­gs to con­si­der.

First of all, when an obser­va­tion is seve­ral years old befo­re it is repor­ted, it always rai­ses some issu­es. Over such a long peri­od of time, a wit­ness’ ori­gi­nal memory will have chan­ged from what he or she ori­gi­nal­ly saw (or think they saw) and be open to other influ­en­ces — inclu­ding, in this case, the pre­vious expe­ri­en­ce of the wit­ness’ own parents. There­fo­re, it is dif­fi­cult to say how much of PN’s acco­unt descri­bes what he actu­al­ly saw back then and how much is his after-the-fact attempt at making sen­se of the expe­ri­en­ce. Details like engi­ne fail­u­re on vehi­c­les was alre­a­dy clo­se­ly asso­ci­a­ted with UFO’s in the ear­ly 1980’s, and could in that sen­se have been con­fa­bu­la­ted into PN’s obser­va­tion, howe­ver much of a wild coin­ci­den­ce it may seem to be. It is also stran­ge that PN descri­bed the wor­ker ali­ens dig­ging up soil samp­les, yet when retur­ning to the lan­ding site the same day he could not find any phy­si­cal marks whatso­e­ver. This indi­ca­tes that at least part of the obser­va­tion may not have been a phy­si­cal rea­li­ty.

The final ver­di­ct from the SUFOI inve­sti­ga­tors was of a wit­ness being hone­st to them, at least to the best of his know­led­ge and memory. In other words: PN real­ly belie­ved that he had expe­ri­en­ced what he repor­ted, and that it was somet­hing otherwor­ld­ly. But the lack of phy­si­cal evi­den­ce (even by admis­sion of PN him­self), made the inve­sti­ga­tors more incli­ned to belie­ve that PN could have had an advan­ced hal­luci­na­tory expe­ri­en­ce, whe­re pre-exi­sting ideas about ali­ens and spa­ces­hips fil­led in the gaps in his mind when inter­pre­ting the expe­ri­en­ce into sen­se data. The question then beco­mes, what trig­ge­red this hal­luci­na­tion — and the engi­ne fail­u­re of the car — to begin with?

Sour­ces

  • UFO-Nyt #1 (1997)
  • SUFOI News­let­ter #17 (1999)