Aro­und 1950, a boy from Copen­ha­gen had a clo­se enco­un­ter with a myste­rious object, that see­m­ing­ly paved the way for a spi­ri­tu­al awa­ke­ning. Read more here!

Case Type: CE1 (Clo­se Enco­un­ter of The First Kind)

When: 1949 or 1950 (Not repor­ted until 1968, publis­hed in 1969)

Whe­re: San­kel­marks­ga­de (“San­kel­mark Stre­et”), Copen­ha­gen

Inve­sti­ga­tor: Tho­mas Bris­son Jør­gen­sen

A Stran­ge Night­ly Guest

One eve­ning in 1949 or 1950, GK (ano­ny­mized short form of the wit­nes­ses real name), who was a small boy at the time, was stan­ding near the win­dow in the bedroom he sha­red with his youn­ger sister, in their family apart­ment on San­kel­marks­ga­de 11, Copen­ha­gen. Sud­den­ly he noti­ced a whi­te light on the other side of the stre­et, a bit to the left of his field of view.

The light tur­ned out to be com­ing from an unusu­al object, roug­hly 1 meter in dia­me­ter, ellip­ti­cal and with sharp sur­face con­tours. It did not appear to be com­ple­te­ly solid, howe­ver, as light see­med to be com­ing from wit­hin the object, illu­mi­nat­ing its sur­face. The light chan­ged from yel­low to red, pul­sat­ing and glowing at various inten­si­ties wit­hin this spectrum.

GK obser­ved the object flo­at slo­wly to the right, until it pas­sed their win­dow, still on the oppo­si­te side of the stre­et. GK then ran to inform his parents, who at the time had visi­tors and appa­rent­ly could­n’t be bot­he­red liste­ning to what he had to say. He then went back to his room, whe­re he saw that the object had only moved a few meters furt­her to the right.

The UFO star­ted to move faster aro­und the time it got to San­kel­marks­ga­de No. 5 and made a turn furt­her down the stre­et, befo­re swin­ging back again to the left. GK saw it again when it was about 5 meters from their apart­ment, at the door of San­kel­marks­ga­de 9. The object then swung back again and flew through an open door into an apart­ment cour­ty­ard on the other side of the stre­et, whe­re it com­ple­te­ly lit up the area. It stay­ed here for a long time, so long in fact that he did­n’t think it would come back out again.

Howe­ver, the object did even­tu­al­ly emer­ge, and this time it cros­sed the stre­et and ascen­ded to a stop right out­si­de his bedroom win­dow. The light was now slight­ly red on the left, and yel­low on the right side of the object, whi­le its cen­ter stay­ed oran­ge in col­or. GK could not explain why, but he got the fee­ling that it was wat­ching him and that it was curious about him, despi­te the object not having any defi­ning fea­tu­res such as holes or win­dows. GK was not afraid of the UFO, he only felt a bit stran­ge. 

After having stood face to face with the object for a whi­le, GK got the fee­ling that per­haps the “wat­cher” wan­ted to come insi­de, so he craw­led onto the win­dowsill to open the win­dow. Howe­ver somet­hing con­vin­ced him not to, and sin­ce he was also afraid that he might fall out of the win­dow, he aban­do­ned the idea. He then resu­med look­ing at the object until he at some point — for some rea­son he did­n’t ela­bo­ra­te on — could­n’t any­mo­re. He then went to bed next to his sister and short­ly the­re­af­ter fell asle­ep. Just befo­re that he heard a “bump” on the win­dow. 

After­math

During an inter­view Hid­den­mark did with GK in 2025, the now almost 80 years old, but extre­me­ly sharp and healt­hy pen­sio­ner, reve­a­led that he expe­ri­en­ced ano­t­her stran­ge enco­un­ter about 5–7 years later.

He was sit­ting in the stairway of the same apart­ment buil­ding one bright sun­ny day, when he saw a solid, whi­te beam of light shine down onto the stre­et out­si­de, appa­rent­ly ori­gi­nat­ing from some pla­ce above. It hap­pe­ned very qui­ck­ly, but he remem­bers thin­king that “they” wan­ted to take him, alt­hough he is not sure what he actu­al­ly thought that “they” were back then. He also explai­ned that he does not have any actu­al strong opi­ni­ons or furt­her thoughts about eit­her inci­dent, but sees them as just examp­les of a long line of stran­ge expe­ri­en­ces, of which he has had many throug­hout his life.

GK for examp­le told that he had had a qui­te ela­bo­ra­te pre­mo­ni­tory vision about 9/11, just pri­or to the atta­ck, whe­re he in some abstra­ct form saw many, of what he inter­pre­ted as, victims. He also has had an extre­me­ly keen intu­i­tion throug­hout his life, and final­ly beca­me a pra­cti­cing hea­ler about 20 years ago, after many syn­chro­ni­stic hin­ts and encou­ra­ge­ment from peop­le aro­und him.

Pho­to of San­kel­marks­ga­de, taken a few years back. No. 11 is the yel­low buil­ding that can be seen up ahe­ad, to the right

Com­men­tary

At the time of the repor­ting in 1968, SUFOI (Scan­di­navi­an UFO Inve­sti­ga­tion, publis­hers of the jour­nal “UFO-Nyt”) clas­si­fied the sigh­ting as a so-cal­led “tele­me­ter disc”. The term ori­gi­na­tes from the Polish-Ame­ri­can UFO con­ta­ctee Geor­ge Adam­ski (1891–1965), who belie­ved that extra­ter­re­stri­als ope­ra­ted the­se small disc-sha­ped remo­te con­trol­led sur­veil­lan­ce pro­bes, from gre­at cigar-sha­ped mot­hers­hips in orbit aro­und the Earth.

To 21st cen­tury rea­ders, both GK’s own descrip­tion of the UFO and Adam­ski’s con­cept of tele­me­ter discs sound very similar to the dro­nes that are used by both poli­ce, mili­tary and pri­va­te owners today. One won­ders how many sigh­tings of small UFOs that still appea­red to be under intel­li­gent con­trol might have their root in very ear­ly testing of dro­ne tech­no­lo­gy, which were pro­bably top secret pro­jects by mili­tary and intel­li­gen­ce agen­cies at the time. But that then rai­ses the question: Why test it in the most popu­la­ted city in Den­mark, in a stre­et whe­re hund­reds of peop­le lived?

Whi­le it is in no way impos­sib­le that many of the details are due to the acti­ve fan­ta­sy of a young child, only 3–4 years old at the time, the fee­ling descri­bed about the object wat­ching with some kind of sen­tien­ce, is remi­ni­s­cent of many UFO cases. Spe­ci­fi­cal­ly it has many paral­lels to an inci­dent that took pla­ce years later, not ter­ri­bly far from San­kel­marks­ga­de. In this case as well as in the expe­ri­en­ces of GK, we see an ele­ment of “spi­ri­tu­al growth” that appears to have been spar­ked by the enco­un­ter with a UFO.

One somewhat puzzling detail is GK sud­den­ly “not being able” to look at the object any lon­ger, and sim­ply going to bed. This seems irra­tio­nal and per­haps a litt­le fru­strat­ing, but it is in fact a very com­mon rea­ction from UFO wit­nes­ses in gene­ral. At the same time, the­re did­n’t seem to be a who­le lot more for GK to accom­plish by staying up, and we can­not ascri­be the same rea­ctions to small chil­dren as we can with adults. 

With that said, the final word should be that we have to be cau­tious with UFO expe­ri­en­ces that are repor­ted many years later. Memo­ri­es of details may have beco­me distor­ted or out­right chan­ged over the years. This would be all the more true, when we are tal­king about the memo­ri­es of chil­dren.

In this arti­c­le we have taken GK’s ori­gi­nal report and chan­ged it to fit the details that came out during our inter­view, as he sug­ge­sted that the 1969 arti­c­le inclu­des err­ors. But we still can­not be sure how much distor­tion has ente­red the pic­tu­re, even from the time of the repor­ting of the expe­ri­en­ce until today.

Sour­ces

  • UFO-Nyt #1  (1969)
  • Inter­view with GK from okto­ber 2025.